His stance makes little sense. One of the reasons he enjoys such strong support among Christian conservatives is because of what he was able to accomplish in regards to abortion in his first term. To now take an opposite opinion (yes, yes, I know the argument that he wants to leave it up to the states) is basically a slap in the face to …
His stance makes little sense. One of the reasons he enjoys such strong support among Christian conservatives is because of what he was able to accomplish in regards to abortion in his first term. To now take an opposite opinion (yes, yes, I know the argument that he wants to leave it up to the states) is basically a slap in the face to these supporters.
And, like I said, it makes little sense. He will not win over one single voter with his current pandering. No one who supports abortion or IVF is going to vote for him because he is backtracking. On the other hand, he could very well lose many supporters and many votes because of it. Whoever is telling him to do this is an idiot. Hopefully, it's not his idea...
It's not an opposite opinion Jason. He's pro-life and he's done more for the movement than any other President in recent memory. Are you going to deny that so a left-wing radical administration is given our American power for 4 more years?
The very fact that we're talking about it is evidence to how dumb it is. His pro-life stance was his strongest argument for many conservatives. The fact that he made it an issue by weaving doubt into his statements is just idiotic. I will still vote for him, but I have no idea how others will vote. Neither does he now. That's my point.
Good pint but the fact of the matter is his policy position hasn't changed. He opposed Roe as bad law and barbaric, wanted the issue sent back to the states. AMAZIGLY pulled it off. Got rid of the National abomination. Something pro-life marchers dreamed about and prayed for for generations. He did it by appointing actual Justices who know and write actual law not make-believe legal fiction. He always supported exceptions like most conservative Republican politicians. IVF is a new issue. But it squares with his particular pro-life understanding. he's not a conservative Catholic. I'm stating the obvious. He'll never support a national ban. That would contradict his Roe stance. We have nothing to complain about. Our job is to catechize the Nation and particularly women with the truth of the culture of life Not force law on them like the elites did for generations.
His stance makes little sense. One of the reasons he enjoys such strong support among Christian conservatives is because of what he was able to accomplish in regards to abortion in his first term. To now take an opposite opinion (yes, yes, I know the argument that he wants to leave it up to the states) is basically a slap in the face to these supporters.
And, like I said, it makes little sense. He will not win over one single voter with his current pandering. No one who supports abortion or IVF is going to vote for him because he is backtracking. On the other hand, he could very well lose many supporters and many votes because of it. Whoever is telling him to do this is an idiot. Hopefully, it's not his idea...
We only have 2 choices this Nov.! Either Communism or Trump.
Trump isn't perfect by any means, no president ever was but he's the only choice I'm voting for.
I'm totally against abortion but I and my family don't want to live in a Democrat Communist regime, PERIOD!!
True, but it doesn't mean we can't and shouldn't make our opinions known and hold him accountable.
It's not an opposite opinion Jason. He's pro-life and he's done more for the movement than any other President in recent memory. Are you going to deny that so a left-wing radical administration is given our American power for 4 more years?
The very fact that we're talking about it is evidence to how dumb it is. His pro-life stance was his strongest argument for many conservatives. The fact that he made it an issue by weaving doubt into his statements is just idiotic. I will still vote for him, but I have no idea how others will vote. Neither does he now. That's my point.
Good pint but the fact of the matter is his policy position hasn't changed. He opposed Roe as bad law and barbaric, wanted the issue sent back to the states. AMAZIGLY pulled it off. Got rid of the National abomination. Something pro-life marchers dreamed about and prayed for for generations. He did it by appointing actual Justices who know and write actual law not make-believe legal fiction. He always supported exceptions like most conservative Republican politicians. IVF is a new issue. But it squares with his particular pro-life understanding. he's not a conservative Catholic. I'm stating the obvious. He'll never support a national ban. That would contradict his Roe stance. We have nothing to complain about. Our job is to catechize the Nation and particularly women with the truth of the culture of life Not force law on them like the elites did for generations.