Hillary Clinton, still a celebrated figure among the American left, was invited onto MSNBC for a discussion largely centered on the achievement of women, in light of the patronizing annual Women’s History Month.
Beware of the those calling for ubiquitous tolerance because they will be intolerant of those they disagree with. Calling out for it is likely a shibboleth of those lacking it because it is manifesting their shadow. We have met the enemy, and the enemy is us. They have met the enemy, and in their delusional think it is not them.
Women started being encouraged to join the workforce, and work outside the home for 2 reasons. First reason is to increase the tax income so the politicians can finance their pet projects. The second reason is to get mom out of the house, away from the kids so the kids can more easily be indoctrinated with communist ideals and now perversion.
You certainly covered all of the bases very well, Sarah, as usual. Just when you think it can't get any worse, Hillary came through. With her, what do you expect. So pathetic!!
I totally agree, Sarah. I would like to add; Man's natural instinct (yes, we have them) is to protect the "vessel of life" , a Woman. Only women can get pregnant, carry the infant, and give birth to another human being. One woman in combat can neutralize at least 4 men. The men in front, on either side and directly behind are going to first - protect the woman, second - focus on the mission. This is a formula for failure of the mission. Because of this fact (talk to a psycologist if you don't believe me) the mission is likely to fail. In spite of the hubris of the perverts who say otherwise, women do not belong in combat. They don't belong in men's sports, in front-line firefighting, rescue missions, etc... they don't have the upper body strength to accomplish what is needed. It's nature.
It's based on the fallacy that outliers define the norm, which is still a healthy, strong 20-25 year old male. The long controversy over the single standard Army Combat Fitness Test has proven this beyond reasonable doubt.
Sara: Thanks for your take on things. I always read them, and I love your videos. Don't you think that everyone knows what you commented on in this blurb is true; i.e., men sacrifice and die and have done so for 50,000 years on behalf of the weaker and more vulnerable ? Isn't this obvious to all humanity?
I think most people have at least some comprehension of it. There are some who have spent so much time in perverted academia settings that they cannot see the wood for the trees. Regardless though, the number of people that know it to be true is likely significantly larger than those who are willing to say so. We suffer because so few people are willing to say these obvious truths, which leads people to think that they are alone in their sanity. The only way to awaken people to the fact that they are part of a silent majority is to begin speaking what they (ought to) know is true.
Hi Ms Cain. I have just started reading your columns. You really hit the mark! We had "Hillarity" in Arkansas for many years! She's clever...and vicious. I was going to ask--are there members of Gen Z or any other "Gens" who are seeing this the way you do? I fear we dont have the numbers to fight it? Do we?
This is a good comment on victimhood and preferred groups. The basis of Christian Judaic law had always been the primacy of the individual standing before God and the government with respect to rights and responsibilities. This was upset to a large degree by the civil rights laws of the 60s in the US. They established group rights over the rights of individuals and led to the tribalization of groups, pitting one against another. The civils rights laws could have accomplished the same purpose without destroying the foundations of our unity and greatly diminishing the value of the individual. Leroy Washington had a moral and legal right to vote and sit at the lunch counter not because he was black but because he was a free man created in the image of God and a citizen in good standing. The same rights and responsibilities applied to everyone, irrespective of one's group membership, are the basis for equal justice under the law. Unfortunately, group rights has set aside equal rights under the law for individuals and resulted in tribalism where the society and the courts must constantly choose between what group they will favor. This can lead only to further deterioration of "e pluribus unum" and will serve only those who wish to dominate us
This is a good comment on victimhood and preferred groups. The basis of Christian Judaic law had always been the primacy of the individual standing before God and the government with respect to rights and responsibilities. This was upset to a large degree by the civil rights laws of the 60s in the US. They established group rights over the rights of individuals and led to the tribalization of groups, pitting one against another. The civils rights laws could have accomplished the same purpose without destroying the foundations of our unity and greatly diminishing the value of the individual. Leroy Washington had a moral and legal right to vote and sit at the lunch counter not because he was black but because he was a free man created in the image of God and a citizen in good standing. The same rights and responsibilities applied to everyone, irrespective of one's group membership, are the basis for equal justice under the law. Unfortunately, group rights has set aside equal rights under the law for individuals and resulted in tribalism where the society and the courts must constantly choose between what group they will favor with little basis for doing so. This can lead only to further deterioration of "e pluribus unum" and will serve only those who wish to dominate us
As a man in his 60s, Sarah, thanks for your support. I have watched as for decades men have been relegated further and further down the heap of social justice until we are given the about same status as cockroaches. I am touched that you appreciate us. Thank you and God bless you.
Straightforward and well stated. Thank you.
Beware of the those calling for ubiquitous tolerance because they will be intolerant of those they disagree with. Calling out for it is likely a shibboleth of those lacking it because it is manifesting their shadow. We have met the enemy, and the enemy is us. They have met the enemy, and in their delusional think it is not them.
Women started being encouraged to join the workforce, and work outside the home for 2 reasons. First reason is to increase the tax income so the politicians can finance their pet projects. The second reason is to get mom out of the house, away from the kids so the kids can more easily be indoctrinated with communist ideals and now perversion.
Communism and perversion both degrade the human spirit.
You certainly covered all of the bases very well, Sarah, as usual. Just when you think it can't get any worse, Hillary came through. With her, what do you expect. So pathetic!!
I totally agree, Sarah. I would like to add; Man's natural instinct (yes, we have them) is to protect the "vessel of life" , a Woman. Only women can get pregnant, carry the infant, and give birth to another human being. One woman in combat can neutralize at least 4 men. The men in front, on either side and directly behind are going to first - protect the woman, second - focus on the mission. This is a formula for failure of the mission. Because of this fact (talk to a psycologist if you don't believe me) the mission is likely to fail. In spite of the hubris of the perverts who say otherwise, women do not belong in combat. They don't belong in men's sports, in front-line firefighting, rescue missions, etc... they don't have the upper body strength to accomplish what is needed. It's nature.
It's based on the fallacy that outliers define the norm, which is still a healthy, strong 20-25 year old male. The long controversy over the single standard Army Combat Fitness Test has proven this beyond reasonable doubt.
Sara: Thanks for your take on things. I always read them, and I love your videos. Don't you think that everyone knows what you commented on in this blurb is true; i.e., men sacrifice and die and have done so for 50,000 years on behalf of the weaker and more vulnerable ? Isn't this obvious to all humanity?
Eric Hj.
I think most people have at least some comprehension of it. There are some who have spent so much time in perverted academia settings that they cannot see the wood for the trees. Regardless though, the number of people that know it to be true is likely significantly larger than those who are willing to say so. We suffer because so few people are willing to say these obvious truths, which leads people to think that they are alone in their sanity. The only way to awaken people to the fact that they are part of a silent majority is to begin speaking what they (ought to) know is true.
If you are silent then you agree with the situation.
The law calls this Joint Enterprise, that makes you all guilty of THE crime, therefore equal punishment.
Sarah: great article; there is a special place in hell awaiting HC,
Hi Ms Cain. I have just started reading your columns. You really hit the mark! We had "Hillarity" in Arkansas for many years! She's clever...and vicious. I was going to ask--are there members of Gen Z or any other "Gens" who are seeing this the way you do? I fear we dont have the numbers to fight it? Do we?
This is a good comment on victimhood and preferred groups. The basis of Christian Judaic law had always been the primacy of the individual standing before God and the government with respect to rights and responsibilities. This was upset to a large degree by the civil rights laws of the 60s in the US. They established group rights over the rights of individuals and led to the tribalization of groups, pitting one against another. The civils rights laws could have accomplished the same purpose without destroying the foundations of our unity and greatly diminishing the value of the individual. Leroy Washington had a moral and legal right to vote and sit at the lunch counter not because he was black but because he was a free man created in the image of God and a citizen in good standing. The same rights and responsibilities applied to everyone, irrespective of one's group membership, are the basis for equal justice under the law. Unfortunately, group rights has set aside equal rights under the law for individuals and resulted in tribalism where the society and the courts must constantly choose between what group they will favor. This can lead only to further deterioration of "e pluribus unum" and will serve only those who wish to dominate us
This is a good comment on victimhood and preferred groups. The basis of Christian Judaic law had always been the primacy of the individual standing before God and the government with respect to rights and responsibilities. This was upset to a large degree by the civil rights laws of the 60s in the US. They established group rights over the rights of individuals and led to the tribalization of groups, pitting one against another. The civils rights laws could have accomplished the same purpose without destroying the foundations of our unity and greatly diminishing the value of the individual. Leroy Washington had a moral and legal right to vote and sit at the lunch counter not because he was black but because he was a free man created in the image of God and a citizen in good standing. The same rights and responsibilities applied to everyone, irrespective of one's group membership, are the basis for equal justice under the law. Unfortunately, group rights has set aside equal rights under the law for individuals and resulted in tribalism where the society and the courts must constantly choose between what group they will favor with little basis for doing so. This can lead only to further deterioration of "e pluribus unum" and will serve only those who wish to dominate us
As a man in his 60s, Sarah, thanks for your support. I have watched as for decades men have been relegated further and further down the heap of social justice until we are given the about same status as cockroaches. I am touched that you appreciate us. Thank you and God bless you.
As always you are100% right in what you say, I do not think you and Hillary would get along , nor would I come to that.
Hector laments the fate soon to befall his beloved wife and child, left unprotected:
“May I lie dead under the barrow that is heaped over my body ere I hear your cry as they carry you into bondage."
Hector fought, and died, “specifically to protect women and children”, as you write.
http://classics.mit.edu/Homer/iliad.6.vi.html
Two thumbs up!