Nietzche is ultimately just articulating and arguing for the psychopaths' natural worldview. Machiavelli's "the Prince" is also either advising or satiring a psychopathic or similarly corrupted leadership.
Nietzche is ultimately just articulating and arguing for the psychopaths' natural worldview. Machiavelli's "the Prince" is also either advising or satiring a psychopathic or similarly corrupted leadership.
I wouldn't recommend them, personally. They aren't very good. But they are somewhat culturally relevant these days especially in certain "right wing" circles, so if thats what you're after, go for it. I would, however, highly recommend you add Political Ponerology to your reading list as well, if you haven't read it. It was very enlightening in this regard.
Nietzche is ultimately just articulating and arguing for the psychopaths' natural worldview. Machiavelli's "the Prince" is also either advising or satiring a psychopathic or similarly corrupted leadership.
Thanks for clarifiying.
I wouldn't recommend them, personally. They aren't very good. But they are somewhat culturally relevant these days especially in certain "right wing" circles, so if thats what you're after, go for it. I would, however, highly recommend you add Political Ponerology to your reading list as well, if you haven't read it. It was very enlightening in this regard.