Dawkins aspires to be a god, among other gods, initially, but a god of the highest order, eventually. I could replace “god” with “aristocrat” and my first sentence would remain true.
Dawkins, and others like him, will only change when they have an equivalent “road to Damascus” moment. You are eise to mistrust any present softening.
Dawkins aspires to be a god, among other gods, initially, but a god of the highest order, eventually. I could replace “god” with “aristocrat” and my first sentence would remain true.
Dawkins, and others like him, will only change when they have an equivalent “road to Damascus” moment. You are eise to mistrust any present softening.
Dawkins aspires to be a god, among other gods, initially, but a god of the highest order, eventually. I could replace “god” with “aristocrat” and my first sentence would remain true.
Dawkins, and others like him, will only change when they have an equivalent “road to Damascus” moment. You are eise to mistrust any present softening.