The War on Truth, in the Name of Empathy
How Hillary Clinton trades the innocent for the guilty and calls it Christianity.
This essay was published in full at Crisis Magazine, and can be read freely there. The introduction follows:
Hillary Clinton has written an op-ed for The Atlantic, which is permeated with moral indignation. She decries MAGA’s War on Empathy and then engages in a one-woman war on Truth. It may remind readers of the older rhetoric of the political left, which they don’t use as much anymore, wherein they proclaim that those on the right are immoral monsters and those on the left are heroically trying to protect the victims and institute virtuous policies.
Hillary claims that the conservative movement is morally descending. Thus, she laments the lost era of Reagan’s optimism and cheery personality, but her entire essay stands in testament to his reminder that “the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they’re ignorant; it’s just that they know so much that isn’t so.”
Continue reading this article at Crisis Magazine.
The argument of the far left with it's all inclusive wrappings is that morality can only exist when there are no morals. In other words, your moral compass is no longer fixed but rather it constantly points to a new north star depending on what situation you're in.
In this ideology, morality becomes relevant only in the sense of agitating for the latest cause. Once that cause is no longer relevant, you move on to another cause and your moral compass re-orientats itself accordingly. The villain is the person who can tell the difference between right and wrong.
In this day and age, the most important thing anyone can do is to think for themselves. In fact, it's practically an act of outright rebellion to think independently.
No more veils; no more gray lines or shades. Those who advocate human sacrifice from the flesh to the intellect vs those who stand against it. The arguments do not make sense to the opposing sides. The Spiritual Battle is heightening.